Status and Details

This page contains information about the status, approval and implementation of this document, contact details for the relevant Unit Head and document author and, on the right, a brief summary of changes between this and the previous version.

Academic Misconduct (Coursework) Procedure

Show Field Notes

Status	Current	Indicates if this version of the document is in effect (Current), yet to come into effect (Future), or expired (Historic).
Effective Date	3rd December 2024	This is the date on which this version of the document came into effect.
Review Date	3rd December 2027	The next review of this document is scheduled to commence on this date.
Approval Authority	Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Strategy and Assurance)	The noted authority approved this is version of the document.
Approval Date	27th November 2024	This is the date on which this version of the document was approved by the authorised authority.
Expiry Date	Not Applicable	This is the date on which this version expires. It may still apply, conditionally, after this date.
Responsible Officer	Dominic Riordan Director, Academic Quality and Standards	The position responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of a policy document and its review.
Responsible Executive	Sue Bennett Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic and Student Life)	The position with overarching responsibility for ensuring implementation of, and compliance with, the policy document.
Enquiries Contact	Dajana Tubaro Specialist, Academic Quality and Policy Academic Quality and Standards Division	General enquiries should be directed to the officer/area listed.

Summary of Changes from Previous Version

The Academic Misconduct (Coursework) Procedure and Academic Misconduct Outcome Guideline have been reviewed as part of the scheduled review of the Academic Integrity Policy Suite which commenced in mid-2023.
Once the proposed amendments have been approved the changes will be rolled out as per the implementation presented to Academic Senate. Phase three of the proposed changes will necessitate updates to the Academic Misconduct Management BPM system and will also require additional resources and training to be developed to support decision makers.
Key changes to language, outcomes, subject coordinator role, student experience, AIO role, replacing committees with a delegated authority, establishing an Office of Academic Integrity.

Clauses Amended:Procedure: All