(1) This Procedure supports and should be read in conjunction with the Student Conduct Rules. In accordance with the Student Conduct Rules, this Procedure must be followed when managing alleged general misconduct by a student. (2) The purpose of this Procedure is to direct UOW staff and students on the process to be used when managing alleged general misconduct by a student. (3) This Procedure applies to the management of alleged general misconduct by a student of UOW (as defined in section 3 of the Student Conduct Rules), under the circumstances defined in section 4 of the Student Conduct Rules. (4) The Primary Investigation Officer (PIO) has a responsibility to: (5) Investigation Committee Chairs and members have a responsibility to undertake investigations of alleged general misconduct by a student in accordance with the procedures set out in section 6 and section 7. (6) The Associate Director, Integrity (or other nominated officer) has a responsibility to receive, and make a decision upon, appeals by students against a decision of the PIO. (7) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education) has a responsibility to receive, and make a decision upon, appeals by students against a decision of the Student Conduct Committee. (8) The Vice-Chancellor and President has a responsibility to undertake action in accordance with the Urgency Provisions set out in section 5. (9) The Safe and Respectful Communities Team has a responsibility to: (10) Other roles and responsibilities are detailed in section 5 of the Student Conduct Rules. (11) Acceptable and unacceptable general conduct of a student is outlined in: (12) General misconduct by a student is defined in the Student Conduct Rules. General misconduct may be managed with a Low-Level or High-Level outcome as shown in Table 4.1: (13) The persons or committees that are authorised to implement outcomes at different levels are shown in Table 4.2 (14) A determination (finding) of whether general misconduct by a student has occurred will be made on the strength of the evidence available. (15) Where a finding of general misconduct by a student has been made, the following considerations may be taken into account when determining an appropriate outcome: (16) Where alleged general misconduct by a student: (17) A recommendation may be made to the Vice-Chancellor and President that the following action be taken, pending the outcome of the investigation: (18) The following officers may, after preliminary review, make a recommendation as detailed in clause 17: (19) Upon receiving a recommendation under clause 17, the Vice-Chancellor and President or standing nominee of the Vice-Chancellor and President may either: (20) Where action is imposed under clause 19, the officer that recommended the action to the Vice-Chancellor and President or standing nominee of the Vice-Chancellor and President will: (21) In accordance with the Campus Access and Order Rules, every supervising staff member is empowered to request a student involved in disorderly conduct during a teaching activity (such as a lecture, tutorial or practical demonstration) that impedes the normal functioning of that activity to leave the activity for the duration of the activity, provided that: (22) Note: If a student refuses to comply with a request to leave a teaching activity, academic staff are advised to contact Security for further assistance on 4221 4555. (23) Staff members responsible for managing alleged general misconduct by a student will follow the process set out in this Procedure and the Management of Alleged General Misconduct by a Student Flowchart. (24) This Procedure provides a staged investigation and appeal process for dealing with all allegations of general misconduct by a student: (25) Table 6.1 shows the officers that hold the position of Primary Investigation Officer (PIO) for the purpose of managing alleged general misconduct by a student: (26) PIO's are permitted to seek advice from other University officers during the investigation of alleged general misconduct by a student. Where possible, such advice should be sought from officers who are unlikely to be involved in the conduct of the investigation at a later date. PIO's may obtain administrative assistance from other staff members during the investigation. (27) The Safe and Respectful Communities Team will maintain a record of all PIO's. (28) A staff member must bring an allegation of general misconduct by a student to the attention of an appropriate PIO as soon as practicable after the alleged misconduct has occurred. A complainant student may bring an allegation of general misconduct by a respondent student to the attention of an appropriate PIO. The staff member or student complainant will provide the PIO with relevant information and evidence relating to the allegation. If necessary, the PIO may collect further evidence relating to the allegation. (29) The PIO will determine whether there is sufficient evidence that general misconduct may have occurred. (30) If there is not sufficient evidence that general misconduct may have occurred, the allegation will be dismissed. The PIO will advise the complainant that the allegation has been dismissed. No further action will be taken. (31) If there is sufficient evidence that general misconduct may have occurred, the allegation will be upheld and investigated by the PIO. (32) The PIO will seek to discuss the allegation with the respondent student and will obtain a response to the allegation. (33) The PIO will provide the following information to the respondent student in writing prior to the discussion, using the appropriate notice letter template: (34) During the discussion with the respondent student, the PIO will explain the allegation and give the respondent student an opportunity to respond to it. The respondent student has the right to refuse to respond to the allegation. (35) Both the respondent student and the PIO are permitted to be assisted by a support person during the discussion. (36) The PIO will keep an adequate record of the discussion. With the permission of the respondent student, the PIO may make an audio recording of the discussion and attach this to the investigation file. (37) If, after all reasonable efforts have been made to contact and discuss the allegation with the respondent student, the PIO has not been able to do so; they may proceed with the investigation without discussion with the respondent student. (38) Based on the evidence collected, including information gathered during the discussion with the respondent student where this has taken place, the PIO will make a finding of whether general misconduct has occurred. The PIO must make this finding as soon as possible and within a maximum of 10 working days of having received the allegation. (39) If the PIO finds that general misconduct has not occurred, the allegation will be dismissed. (40) The PIO will advise the respondent student and complainant student that the allegation has been dismissed. (41) In some cases where the PIO finds that general misconduct has not occurred, they may determine that an informal response to the respondent student’s conduct is required. Actions that may be taken under an informal response are: (42) The PIO may take action under an informal response at their discretion. A record of the interaction will be kept by the PIO. (43) If the PIO finds that general misconduct has occurred, the allegation will be upheld. (44) The PIO will request the Safe and Respectful Communities Team to check the Central Register to determine whether an entry exists for the respondent student for any previous finding of general misconduct. (45) The PIO will determine the appropriate level of outcome. In doing so, the PIO may give consideration to the factors listed in clause 16. (46) If the PIO determines that a low-level outcome is appropriate, they will continue with management of the case in accordance with Stage 2 - Conclusion of Investigation by Primary Investigation Officer. (47) If the PIO determines that a high-level outcome is appropriate, the PIO will refer the case to the Student Conduct Committee, in accordance with Stage 3 – Investigation by Student Conduct Committee. (48) When referring a matter to the Student Conduct Committee, the PIO must: (49) An outcome will be determined by the PIO as soon as possible and within a maximum of 10 working days of having determined that general misconduct has occurred. (50) The PIO will determine the appropriate low-level outcome to be applied in accordance with clauses 12 to 15. (51) The PIO will: (52) Once an outcome has been imposed, a respondent student may appeal against a finding of the PIO, only if the appeal is based on a breach of natural justice requirements, a lack of due process, or if there is new and substantial evidence that has not previously been considered. (53) An appeal by a respondent student against a decision of the PIO must: (54) The Associate Director, Integrity (or other nominated officer) will consider the case put forward and evidence provided by the student to support the appeal. (55) The Associate Director, Integrity (or other nominated officer) will determine whether there are sufficient grounds for the appeal as soon as possible and within a maximum of 10 working days of having received the appeal. (56) If the Associate Director, Integrity (or other nominated officer) determines that there are not sufficient grounds for the appeal, then the decision of the PIO stands. Associate Director, Integrity (or other nominated officer) will: (57) The respondent student has no further opportunity to appeal the decision within the University. (58) If the Associate Director, Integrity (or other nominated officer) determines that there are sufficient grounds for the appeal, then the case is either referred back to the PIO for re-consideration (in the case of new and substantial evidence) or to a different PIO or the Student Conduct Committee (in the case of breach of natural justice requirements or lack of due process) for consideration. The Associate Director, Integrity (or other nominated officer) will: (59) The Student Conduct Committee will consider cases referred to it by: (60) The Student Conduct Committee will comprise: (61) A Secretary to the Committee will be appointed by the Senior Institutional Governance Specialist to assist the Committee in whatever way the Chair of the Committee directs. Clause 103 details the role of the Secretary to the Committee. (62) The Student Conduct Committee will meet to consider the evidence of the case and interview the respondent student and any other persons relevant to the case. The Committee will conduct the interview in accordance with sections 12 to 19. Investigation and Appeal Committee Procedures. (63) Based on the evidence considered and the interview with the student, the Student Conduct Committee will make a finding of whether general misconduct has occurred. (64) If the Student Conduct Committee finds that general misconduct has not occurred, the allegation will be dismissed. (65) The Student Conduct Committee will: (66) In some cases where the Student Conduct Committee finds that general misconduct has not occurred, the Committee may determine that an informal response to the respondent student’s conduct is required, and will impose an action in accordance with clauses 41 to 42. (67) If the Student Conduct Committee finds that general misconduct has occurred, the allegation will be upheld. (68) The Student Conduct Committee will then determine the appropriate level of outcome. When doing so, consideration may be given to the factors listed in clause 77. The Student Conduct Committee will: (69) Once an outcome has been imposed, a respondent student may appeal against a finding of the Student Conduct Committee, only if the appeal is based on a breach of natural justice requirements, a lack of due process or if there is new and substantial evidence that has not previously been considered. (70) An appeal by a respondent student against a decision of the Student Conduct Committee must: (71) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education) will consider the case put forward and evidence provided by the student to support the appeal. (72) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education) will determine whether there are sufficient grounds for the appeal as soon as possible and within a maximum of 10 working days of having received the appeal. (73) If the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education) determines that there are not sufficient grounds for the appeal, then the decision of the Student Conduct Committee stands. The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education) will: (74) The respondent student has no further opportunity to appeal the decision within the University. (75) If the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education) determines that there are sufficient grounds for the appeal, then the case is referred to either the Student Conduct Committee for re-consideration (in the case of new and substantial evidence) or the Council Committee of Appeal (in the case of breach of natural justice requirements or lack of due process) for consideration. The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education) will: (76) The Council Committee of Appeal will consider cases referred to the Committee by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education) as a result of appeal by the respondent student against a decision of the Student Conduct Committee. (77) The Council Committee of Appeal will comprise: (78) Staff and student members of the Committee will not be from the same faculty as the respondent student. (79) Members of the Committee will be appointed when required by the Council in accordance with the membership provisions above. If a Council meeting is not imminent when an appeal matter arises, the Committee will be constituted by the Chancellor in accordance with the membership provisions. (80) A Secretary to the Council Committee of Appeal will be appointed by the Secretary to Council to assist the Committee in whatever way the Chair of the Committee directs. Clause 103 details the role of the Secretary to the Committee. (81) As soon as possible, and within a maximum of 10 working days, the Council Committee of Appeal will meet to consider the evidence of the case and interview the respondent student and any other persons relevant to the case. The Committee will conduct the interview in accordance with sections 12 to 19. Investigation & Appeal Committee Procedures. (82) The Council Committee of Appeal will determine whether the appeal is warranted and will be upheld. Where the appeal is upheld, action will be taken to close the matter. (83) If the Council Committee of Appeal determines that the appeal is not warranted, the decision of the Student Conduct Committee will be upheld. (84) The Council Committee of Appeal will: (85) The respondent student will have no further opportunity to appeal the decision within the University. (86) If the Council Committee of Appeal determines that the appeal is warranted, action will be taken to close the matter in accordance with clauses 87 to 89 or 90 to 92. (87) If the Council Committee of Appeal finds that general misconduct has not occurred, the allegation will be dismissed. (88) The Council Committee of Appeal will: (89) In some cases where the Council Committee of Appeal finds that general misconduct has not occurred, the Committee may determine that an informal response to the student’s conduct is required, and will impose an action in accordance with clauses 41 to 42. (90) If the Council Committee of Appeal finds that general misconduct has occurred but that the outcome imposed by the Student Conduct Committee was not appropriate, the allegation will be upheld and the Council Committee of Appeal will impose a new outcome. (91) The Council Committee of Appeal will: (92) The respondent student has no further opportunity to appeal the decision within the University. (93) Any student conduct investigation proceedings, including appeal proceedings, may be suspended by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education) if the respondent student ceases to be enrolled at the University. (94) If student conduct investigation proceedings are suspended under clause 94, the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education) will advise the respondent student that: (95) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education) will ensure that the record of the investigation on the Central Register is updated accordingly. (96) The procedures set out below must be followed by any Investigation Committee when conducting an investigation of alleged general misconduct by a student. (97) Investigation Committees authorised to investigate cases of alleged general misconduct by a student are: (98) The Committee should include representatives from more than one (1) gender. (99) A person may not sit on a committee investigating an allegation of misconduct where that person has previously been involved with the investigation of the allegation, or there is, otherwise, a potential or actual conflict of interest on the part of that person. (100) A member of a committee who, during an investigation or appeal, ceases to hold the office by virtue of which they are a member of that committee, will remain a member of the Committee until the investigation has been completed. (101) If, during the currency of an investigation or appeal, a member of a committee becomes unable (through illness or any other cause) to act for a period that would unduly delay the completion of the investigation, the Committee may complete its investigation or appeal in their absence as long as at least two (2) other members are still able to act. (102) All Investigation Committees will have a Secretary to assist the Committee in whatever way the Chair of the Committee directs. (103) The Secretary: (104) Matters will be referred to an Investigation Committee using the Student Misconduct Investigation Form. Referrals must include full details of the case, including: (105) Where a matter has been referred to the Student Conduct Committee, the Secretary of that committee must serve the respondent student with a written Investigation Notice within 10 working days of the referral. (106) An Investigation Notice served under clause 106 must include: (107) A notice may be served on a respondent student under this Procedure either: (108) If a notice is served by way of SOLSMail and post, it will be deemed to have been served on the student on the date on which it would have been delivered in the ordinary course of the post. (109) A copy of the notice served on a student under clause 105 must be provided to the Associate Director, Integrity, for advice to specific officers of the University for the purpose of relevant administrative action. (110) The Committee meeting should be held within 20 working days of the date of service of the Investigation Notice, unless the Chair of the Committee grants an extension to the respondent student or more time is required to collect necessary evidence. (111) If a respondent student wishes to submit documentation listed in i, ii or iii (below) to the Committee, it must be provided at least two (2) working days before the Committee meeting unless otherwise agreed by the Chair of the Committee: (112) Where a respondent student who has been given due notice chooses not to attend a committee meeting, the Committee may investigate the matter or hear an appeal in the respondent student's absence. (113) In conducting an investigation or appeal meeting, a committee will: (114) Decisions of a committee are made by majority. (115) Where multiple investigations of alleged general misconduct by a particular respondent student are taking place concurrently, the determination of an appropriate outcome for the latter investigation/s may be deferred until the determination of an outcome for the former investigation has been made. (116) A comprehensive file of all relevant documentation, including records of the Committee proceedings, evidence presented and the Committee’s decision should be created, maintained and retained in accordance with section 9 of this Procedure. (117) As soon as practicable after a meeting of the Student Conduct Committee, and within a maximum of 10 working days, the Chair of the Student Conduct Committee (or nominee), must serve the respondent student with written notice of the outcome of the investigation using the appropriate notice letter template. (118) Where the outcome includes a reprimand from the Vice-Chancellor and President, the notice will be signed by the Vice-Chancellor and President (or nominee). (119) Where the Council Committee of Appeal has met in response to a respondent student appeal, as soon as practicable after the meeting and within a maximum of 10 working days, the Secretary of the Committee must serve the respondent student with written notice of the outcome of the appeal using the appropriate notice letter template. (120) A copy of the outcome notice served on a student under clause 118 or 120 must be provided to the Associate Director, Integrity, for advice to specific officers of the University for the purpose of relevant administrative action. (121) At the conclusion of all investigations, the Safe and Respectful Communities Team will update and close the record of the case on the Central Register accordingly. (122) Any time limit set in this Procedure may be extended at the discretion of the PIO or Chair of the Committee, for example, to provide adequate time to gather evidence and convene a meeting or because of special circumstances demonstrated by the respondent student. (123) All Records relating to investigations of student misconduct will be retained and disposed of in accordance with the University’s Records Management Policy, State Records Act 1998, and the General retention and disposal authority: higher and further education records (GA47). Records of the investigation may include: (124) Files relating to cases of general misconduct by a student that have been investigated by the Primary Investigation Officer will be retained and disposed of by the Primary Investigation Officer's division. (125) Files relating to cases of general misconduct by a student that have been investigated by the Student Conduct Committee and/or Council Committee of Appeal will be retained and disposed of by the Safe and Respectful Communities Team (126) Cases of general misconduct by a student resulting in a Low-Level or High-Level outcome will be recorded and filed centrally by the Safe and Respectful Communities Team. The Safe and Respectful Communities Team is responsible for developing and maintaining the Central Register. (127) The student has the right of access to copies of all records relating to the investigation. (128) Investigation and Outcome Notice Templates are available from the Safe and Respectful Communities Team. (129) All other definitions relating to Student Conduct are detailed in section 3 of the Student Conduct Rules.Procedure for Managing Alleged General Misconduct by a Student
Section 1 - Introduction and Purpose
Section 2 - Scope of Procedure
Section 3 - Roles and Responsibilities
Section 4 - General Misconduct by a Student
Responses to General Misconduct by a Student
Table 4.1 - General Misconduct by a Student
Fine (as prescribed in the Library Borrowing Conditions) for overdue items;
Temporary restriction of Library privileges; and/or
Charge for costs of replacing or repairing any damaged property up to $1000
Charge for costs of replacing or repairing any damaged property in excess of $1000;
Fine of up to $1000;
Immediate Suspension by the Vice-Chancellor and President (with or without also suspending any scholarship the student may hold);
Deferred Suspension by the Vice-Chancellor and President subject to one (1) or more conditions (e.g. good behaviour, demonstrated consultation with a registered professional, academic performance);
Exclusion from the University by the Vice-Chancellor and President;
Expulsion from the University by the Vice-Chancellor and President; and/or
Any other penalty that the Vice-Chancellor and President deems appropriate.
Charge for costs of replacing or repairing any damaged property up to $1000; and/or
Requirement of Community Service.
Charge for costs of replacing or repairing any damaged property in excess of $1000;
Withdrawal or restriction of access to IT Account;
Fine of up to $1000;
Immediate Suspension by the Vice-Chancellor and President (with or without also suspending any scholarship the student may hold);
Deferred Suspension by the Vice-Chancellor and President subject to one (1) or more conditions (e.g. good behaviour, demonstrated consultation with a registered professional, academic performance);
Exclusion from the University by the Vice-Chancellor and President;
Expulsion from the University by the Vice-Chancellor and President; and/or
Any other penalty that the Vice-Chancellor and President deems appropriate.
Requirement of community service;
Temporary or permanent eviction from a University Residence;
Temporary or permanent exclusion from the grounds and buildings of a University Residence; and/or
Charge for costs of replacing or repairing any damaged property up to $1000.
Charge for costs of replacing or repairing any damaged property in excess of $1000;
Fine of up to $1000;
Immediate Suspension by the Vice-Chancellor and President (with or without also suspending any scholarship the student may hold);
Deferred Suspension by the Vice-Chancellor and President subject to one (1) or more conditions (e.g. good behaviour, demonstrated consultation with a registered professional, academic performance);
Exclusion from the University by the Vice-Chancellor and President;
Expulsion from the University by the Vice-Chancellor and President; and/or
Any other penalty that the Vice-Chancellor and President deems appropriate.
Fine of up to $250;
Charge for costs of replacing or repairing any damaged property up to $1000; and/or
Limitation of student’s right of access to the University.
Charge for costs of replacing or repairing any damaged property in excess of $1000;
Fine of up to $1000;
Mark penalty in assessment and/or subject where the misconduct could affect academic performance;
Immediate Suspension by the Vice-Chancellor and President (with or without also suspending any scholarship the student may hold);
Deferred Suspension by the Vice-Chancellor and President subject to one (1) or more conditions (e.g. good behaviour, demonstrated consultation with a registered professional, academic performance);
Exclusion from the University by the Vice-Chancellor and President;
Expulsion from the University by the Vice-Chancellor and President;
Withhold official certification (eg academic transcript, degree testamur) for up to three (3) months;
Rescission of degree by the University Council; and/or
Any other penalty that the Vice-Chancellor and President deems appropriate.
Table 4.2 – Persons or Committees Authorised to Implement Outcomes
Low-Level Response
Primary Investigation Officer
Student Conduct Committee
High-Level Response
Student Conduct Committee (in some cases in consultation with the Vice-Chancellor and President)
Determining Whether General Misconduct by a Student Undertaking Coursework has Occurred
Considerations when Determining an Appropriate Outcome
Top of PageSection 5 - Urgency Provisions
Disruption to Teaching Activities
Section 6 - Procedure for Managing Alleged General Misconduct by a Student
Primary Investigation Officers
Table 6.1 – Primary Investigation Officers – General Misconduct
Library Misconduct
Associate Director, Library or standing nominee.
IT Misconduct
Chief Operating Officer / Vice President (Operations) or standing nominee.
Misconduct in University Residence
Associate Director, Student Residence or standing nominee;
Director, Student Life.
Other Misconduct
Associate Director, Integrity or standing nominee.
Section 7 - Stage 1 - Initial Investigation by PIO
Discussion with Respondent Student
Determination by PIO
Allegation Dismissed
Allegation Upheld
Section 8 - Stage 2 - Conclusion of Investigation by Primary Investigation Officer
Low Level Response
Appeal against Finding of Primary Investigation Officer
Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Upheld
Top of PageSection 9 - Stage 3 - Investigation by Student Conduct Committee
Allegation Dismissed
Allegation Upheld
Appeal against Decision of the Student Conduct Committee
Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Upheld
Top of PageSection 10 - Stage 4 - Consideration of an Appeal by Council Committee of Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Upheld
Allegation Dismissed
Allegation Upheld
Section 11 - Termination of Investigation Proceedings
Section 12 - Investigation Committee Procedures
Top of PageSection 13 - Membership of Investigation Committees
Section 14 - Secretary to Investigation Committees
Top of PageSection 15 - Referrals to Investigation Committees
Top of PageSection 16 - Service of an Investigation Notice
Section 17 - Investigation Committee Meetings
Top of PageSection 18 - Conduct of Investigation
Section 19 - Outcome of Investigation
Section 20 - Extension of Time Limits
Section 21 - Record Keeping
Section 22 - Templates
Section 23 - Definitions
Word/Term
Definition (with examples if required)
Central Register
A record of student misconduct investigations, controlled and maintained by the Safe and Respectful Communities Team.
Complainant
A person who claims that a student has acted in a manner that does not comply with the University’s Rules, Codes, Policies or Procedures.
Conflict of interest
A conflict of interest exists where there is a divergence between the individual interests of a staff member and their professional obligation to the University, such that an independent observer might reasonably question whether the professional actions or decisions of that person are influenced by their own interests or are for their own benefit. It should be noted that enmity as well as friendship can give rise to perceptions of a conflict of interest, and similarly, that detriment to a third party can give rise to a conflict of interest just as much as benefit to a third party. A conflict of interest includes an actual, perceived or potential conflict of interest.
Due process
Procedural rights under this Procedure, including the application of the principles of natural justice.
Respondent
A person alleged to have acted in a manner that does not comply with the University’s Rules, Codes, Policies or Procedures.
SOLSMail
Student Online Services email system.
View Current
This is the current version of this document. To view historic versions, click the link in the document's navigation bar.
Library Misconduct
Low-Level Outcomes
Reprimand from the Associate Director, Library or standing nominee;
High-Level Outcomes
Reprimand from the Vice-Chancellor and President;
IT Misconduct
Low-Level Outcomes
Reprimand from the Vice-President Operations or standing nominee;
High-Level Outcomes
Reprimand from the Vice-Chancellor and President;
Misconduct in University Residence
Low-Level Outcomes
Reprimand from the Head of Residence or standing nominee;
High-Level Outcomes
Reprimand from the Vice-Chancellor and President;
Other Misconduct
Low-Level Outcomes
Reprimand from the Associate Director, Integrity or standing nominee;
High-Level Outcomes
Reprimand from the Vice-Chancellor and President;